It is currently Thu May 23, 2013 5:15 pm



Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 New Video 
Author Message
Lt. Colonel
Lt. Colonel

Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 6:42 am
Posts: 794
Post Re: New Video
Bobaganoosh wrote:
I'm sure there are much better comparisons out there, but I was in a hurry


Image

Image


Tue May 24, 2011 8:36 am
Profile
Chief Warrant Officer
Chief Warrant Officer

Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2011 11:29 am
Posts: 296
Post Re: New Video
PC will be the same as it always was...


Tue May 24, 2011 8:41 am
Profile
Colonel
Colonel

Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 9:51 am
Posts: 832
Post Re: New Video
LemoN wrote:
So they're still using the same old engine with horrible textures/explosions.

Well first of all, a lot of COD people play the game because of the feel of that engine. COD in the past has been one of the smoothest avatar movement in a fps game. Like it or not, that's one of the biggest reasons of it being the number one sold game every year.

It doesn't compare with BF3 or Crysis on graphics, but still better than games like Homefront and ROHOS.

Bobaganoosh wrote:
Personally, i think games should have had tessellation 2 years ago...but we were stuck in the console wave for too long. At least some games (BF3) have finally admitted that there are new things to do graphically and in gameplay.

Def agree. I find it funny that some games say they are made for the pc, yet the graphics look 5 years old. If you want to make a game for pc, then push the limits and make it a pc game. Instead they look like console games on a pc.. lol


Tue May 24, 2011 8:45 am
Profile
Lt. Colonel
Lt. Colonel
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 5:38 pm
Posts: 702
Post Re: New Video
TRTL wrote:
LemoN wrote:
So they're still using the same old engine with horrible textures/explosions.

Well first of all, a lot of COD people play the game because of the feel of that engine. COD in the past has been one of the smoothest avatar movement in a fps game. Like it or not, that's one of the biggest reasons of it being the number one sold game every year.

It doesn't compare with BF3 or Crysis on graphics, but still better than games like Homefront and ROHOS.

Bobaganoosh wrote:
Personally, i think games should have had tessellation 2 years ago...but we were stuck in the console wave for too long. At least some games (BF3) have finally admitted that there are new things to do graphically and in gameplay.

Def agree. I find it funny that some games say they are made for the pc, yet the graphics look 5 years old. If you want to make a game for pc, then push the limits and make it a pc game. Instead they look like console games on a pc.. lol


Carmack was saying in 2008 that tessellation was a 5 year old gimmick with no fruit and he would like to focus on compression instead. Personally I find the Unreal engine just looks dated, Sweeney needs to get his act together.


http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphics-C ... re?aid=532

_________________
Don’t stop, PC! Don’t let those ailing console machine devices hold you back.


Tue May 24, 2011 9:21 am
Profile
Lt. Colonel
Lt. Colonel

Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 6:42 am
Posts: 794
Post Re: New Video
jswizzy wrote:
Personally I find the Unreal engine just looks dated, Sweeney needs to get his act together.


Depends.

Image

Image

These two don't look exactly dated, quite the opposite, then again it's a custom UE. Though Stalingrad wasn't exactly the cheeriest and prettiest of places to begin with.

UE with Dx11 looks much better than most engines out there, including some supposedly "awesome" new ones.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSXyztq_0uM


Tue May 24, 2011 9:30 am
Profile
Lt. Colonel
Lt. Colonel
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 5:38 pm
Posts: 702
Post Re: New Video
Kucd wrote:
jswizzy wrote:
Personally I find the Unreal engine just looks dated, Sweeney needs to get his act together.


Depends.

They look dated to me. The lighting is nice but the textures look low resolution. I'm not a big eye candy guy and I'll play games that don't have good graphics if the game play is there. I just haven't been impressed by any games using the unreal engine graphics-wise in a long time.

_________________
Don’t stop, PC! Don’t let those ailing console machine devices hold you back.


Last edited by jswizzy on Tue May 24, 2011 9:52 am, edited 1 time in total.



Tue May 24, 2011 9:46 am
Profile
Colonel
Colonel

Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 9:51 am
Posts: 832
Post Re: New Video
jswizzy wrote:
Kucd wrote:
jswizzy wrote:
Personally I find the Unreal engine just looks dated, Sweeney needs to get his act together.


Depends.

They look dated to me. The lighting is nice but the textures look low resolution.

+1 Heck yes it does. Looks like COD2.


Tue May 24, 2011 9:51 am
Profile
Lt. Colonel
Lt. Colonel

Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 6:42 am
Posts: 794
Post Re: New Video
jswizzy wrote:
They look dated to me. The lighting is nice but the textures look low resolution. I'm not a big eye candy guy and I'll play games that don't have good graphics if the game play is there. I just haven't been impressed by any games using the unreal engine graphics-wise in a long time.


Sure it is low-res, that's alpha footage after all. :D Newer builds of the game have been reported as far better looking with much better textures. Just look at the textures of the soldiers, for instance, much better than the surroundings.

And since the beta has started I think it's safe to say that's an area they've improved, I'm sure.


Tue May 24, 2011 9:56 am
Profile
Lt. Colonel
Lt. Colonel
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 5:38 pm
Posts: 702
Post Re: New Video
Kucd wrote:
jswizzy wrote:
They look dated to me. The lighting is nice but the textures look low resolution. I'm not a big eye candy guy and I'll play games that don't have good graphics if the game play is there. I just haven't been impressed by any games using the unreal engine graphics-wise in a long time.


Sure it is low-res, that's alpha footage after all. :D Newer builds of the game have been reported as far better looking with much better textures. Just look at the textures of the soldiers, for instance, much better than the surroundings.

And since the beta has started I think it's safe to say that's an area they've improved, I'm sure.

I realize its alpha which is why I never said anything about ROHOS's graphics in other threads. But that doesn't change the fact that I feel that Sweeney is 100% putting all his effort into making the engine look great on consoles and not future hardware like Carmack or DICE are.

_________________
Don’t stop, PC! Don’t let those ailing console machine devices hold you back.


Tue May 24, 2011 10:05 am
Profile
Chief Warrant Officer
Chief Warrant Officer

Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2011 11:29 am
Posts: 296
Post Re: New Video
Kucd wrote:
jswizzy wrote:
Personally I find the Unreal engine just looks dated, Sweeney needs to get his act together.


Depends.

Image

Image

These two don't look exactly dated, quite the opposite, then again it's a custom UE. Though Stalingrad wasn't exactly the cheeriest and prettiest of places to begin with.

UE with Dx11 looks much better than most engines out there, including some supposedly "awesome" new ones.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSXyztq_0uM


They don't look that dated but they don't exactly set the heather on fire. In regards to reported "better textures" of course they are going to say that. That is just the same as IW mentioning destruction or having a newer modified engine.


Tue May 24, 2011 10:06 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 38 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.